The practice of health care providers at all levels brings y

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you intocontact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledgeand acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethicalanalysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of twoworldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of yourchoosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar toyou. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism,Shintoism, etc.In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questionsin detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2of Called to Care for the list of questions. Once you haveoutlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysisfrom each perspective.In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis basedupon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes withinsights gained from your research, and answering the followingquestions based on the research:How would each religion interpret the nature of George’s malady andsuffering? Is there a “why” to his disease and suffering? (i.e., isthere a reason for why George is ill, beyond the reality of physicalmalady?)In George’s analysis of his own life, how would each religion thinkabout the value of his life as a person, and value of his life with ALS?What sorts of values and considerations would each religion focus onin deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?Given the above, what options would be morally justified under each religion for George and why?Finally, present and defend your own view.Support your position by referencing at least three academicresources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the coursereadings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Eachreligion must have a primary source included. A total of six referencesare required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporatethe research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APAStyle Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract isrequired.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior tobeginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations forsuccessful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Case Study on Death and Dying 1Unsatisfactory0.00%2Less Than Satisfactory65.00%3Satisfactory75.00%4Good85.00% 5Excellent100.00%70.0 %Content 20.0 %Identification of Ethical Issues as They Relate to the Four Principles of PrinciplismThe ethical issues are incorrectly organized.Ethical issues are adequately organizedaccording to the four principles of principlism. Some of thecategorization is suspect.Ethical issues are organized according to the four principles of principlism.Ethical issues are organized according tothe four principles of principlism. A distinction between the fourprinciples is clearly stated, but the reasoning of the categorization ismerely adequate.Ethical issues are organized according tothe four principles of principlism. A distinction between the fourprinciples and the reasoning of the categorization is clearly stated.20.0 %Description of the Christian Worldview and the Other WorldviewThe description of the Christian worldviewand the selected worldview address little to none of the seven worldviewquestions and the description is mostly incorrect or irrelevant.The description of the Christian worldviewand the selected worldview address most of the seven worldview questionswith little evidence of a surface-level understanding.The description of the Christian worldviewand the selected worldview adequately address all seven worldviewquestions, but the description has a surface-level understanding.The description of the Christian worldviewand the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions withevidence of basic understanding utilizing a detailed description.The description of the Christian worldviewand the selected worldview address all seven worldview questions withevidence of a deep understanding utilizing a detailed description.20.0 %Analysis of Ethical Issues through Christian Worldview and the Other Worldview The primary principles and values in thedecision making process of each worldview have little to no relevance.Ethical reasoning seems to have no connection from the worldviewconsiderations.The primary principles and values areacknowledged in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethicalreasoning is loosely based from the worldview considerations.The primary principles and values surface inthe decision making process of each worldview. Ethical reasoning isimplied from the worldview considerations.The primary principles and values arerecognized in the decision making process of each worldview. Ethicalreasoning is explained from the worldview considerations. Mostimplications of the principles and values are given consideration.The primary principles and values areclearly distinguished in the decision making process of each worldview.Ethical reasoning is clearly delineated from the worldviewconsiderations. The implications of the principles and valuesare given complete consideration.10.0 %Personal RecommendationThe personal recommendation from thestudent’s worldview is stated, but the justification has little to norelevance.The personal recommendation from the student’s worldview is stated with proper justification.The personal recommendation from thestudent’s worldview is stated with proper justification with someimplications explained.The personal recommendation from thestudent’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primaryprinciples of the student’s worldview are clearly described with mostimplications explained.The personal recommendation from thestudent’s worldview is stated with proper justification. The primaryprinciples of the student’s worldview are clearly described with allimplications explained.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 7.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear andforecast the development of the paper. They are descriptive andreflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive.The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesisstatement makes the purpose of the paper clear.8.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by theconclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument isincoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims islacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in thelogic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a fewinconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sourcesused are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions.Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progressionof claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources areauthoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents apersuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources areauthoritative.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough thatthey impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/orsentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errorsdistract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register)and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but notvaried.Some mechanical errors or typos are present,but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and variedsentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effectivesentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but someelements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting isapparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistentand/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerousformatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate toassignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctlydocumented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is freeof error.100 %Total Weightage