Recall Clifford?s argument for evidentialism in Module 2. Pascal, James, and Bergmann all break sharply with Clifford?s evidentialist conclusions, but what, if anything, do they say to help abate Clifford?s main worry, namely, that belief without evidence

Recall Clifford?s argument for evidentialism in Module 2. Pascal, James, and Bergmann all break sharply with Clifford?s evidentialist conclusions, but what, if anything, do they say to help abate Clifford?s main worry, namely, that belief without evidence often leads to trouble? 200 words