Assignment 1. Due 6/5/17 at 10am

Concept of BrandingAssess how branding has increased in the last few decades. Think of a brand; analyze how the organization developed its brand equity. Assess the influence of branding on an organization?s IMC.The paperMust be two to four double-spaced pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style.ÿMust include a separate title page with the following:Title of paperStudent?s nameCourse name and numberInstructor?s nameDate submittedMust use at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course text.Must document all sources in APA style.Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style.

ad

Review the Candidate Interview video, the Maintenance Technician/Janitor job advertisement and the Maintenance Technician/Janitor job description, along with the three candidate resumes.Compare each candidate in a total of 700 to 1,050 words and include the following:Assess the resumes of each interview candidate.Utilize appropriate selection techniques to evaluate and hire the best candidate for the job.Include an analysis of each candidate and defend your choice.Cite any sources according to APA formatting guidelines.

Microsft Company Case Analysis

2 pages about Compensation/Salary determination/Benefits forÿÿMicrosft Company Case Analysisread the what Dr. ask down for more detale about the paperMy part is #3Microsft Company Case AnalysisStep #1- Pick group of 4 or 5Step #2- Send me your group?s preferred company (Microsft Company)Step #3- Analyze the following 5 HR Topic areas below for your company:Recruiting/HiringPerformance appraisal review and processingCompensation/Salary determination/Benefits- which includes topics like:Pay+Health care insuranceLife insuranceDisability insuranceRetirementTuition Assistance PlanEmployee Assistance Program/referralWorkers’ compensationEmployee Health & WellnessStep #4- Provide 2 pages per HR Topic area in your paper (10 pages total) ( my part are 2 pages)Step #5- Provide 2 references that have been published in the last 2 years per HR Topicÿarea in your paper (10 total) ( 2 references that have been published in the last 2 years)————————————————————————————–

discuss whether the physician-patient relationship is a contract and what needs to be shown for a breach of contract to have occurred.

You are working as the manager of a multispecialty clinic. You have been notified that a patient has filed a lawsuit against one of your physicians that has terminated a relationship with a patient. Executive management has asked you to prepare a memo to describe whether a patient can make a successful claim for a breach of contract in this case. In this 2?3-page memo, discuss whether the physician-patient relationship is a contract and what needs to be shown for a breach of contract to have occurred.

Humanity and Justice

Write a 3?4-page summary and analysis of your experiential learning after completing at least four Positive Psychology Journal activities.Required ResourcesThe following resources are required to complete the assessment.Capella MultimediaClick the links provided below to view the following multimedia pieces:Positive Psychology Journalÿ|ÿTranscript.ÿComplete any two activities from Section 4.Complete any two activities from Section 5.SHOW LESSSuggested ResourcesThe following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.Capella ResourcesClick the links provided to view the following resources:APA Paper Template.Research Guide ? Psychology.Identifying Scholarly Resources.Using the APA Manual.Library ResourcesThe following e-books or articles from the Capella University Library are linked directly in this course:Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004).ÿCharacter strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.ÿPages 293?302.Pages 357?368.Forster, J., Epstude, K, & Ozelsel, A. (2009).ÿWhy love has wings and sex has not: How reminders of love and sex influence creative and analytic thinking.ÿPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin,ÿ35(11), 1479?1491.Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006).ÿHappy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention.ÿJournal of Happiness Studies,ÿ7(3), 361?375.Farh, C. I. C. C., Seo, M.-G., & Tesluk, P. E. (2012).ÿEmotional intelligence, teamwork effectiveness, and job performance: The moderating role of job context.ÿJournal of Applied Psychology,ÿ97(4), 890?900.Hooker, B. (2005).ÿFairness.ÿEthical Theory and Moral Practice,ÿ8(4), 329?352.Course Library GuideA Capella University library guide has been created specifically for your use in this course. You are encouraged to refer to the resources in theÿPSYC-FP4110 ? Positive Psychology Library Guideÿto help direct your research.Assessment InstructionsNote:ÿYou are strongly encouraged to complete the assessments in this course in the sequence in which they are presented. You will need to complete Assessments 1?3 before beginning Assessment 4.PreparationFor this assessment, complete at least four journal activities, two from each of Sections 4 and 5, from the Positive Psychology Journal media piece (linked in the Resources):From Section 4, complete any two activities.From Section 5, complete any two activities.DirectionsWrite a summary and analysis of your experiential learning from completing the journal entries. Organize your paper using the headings listed below to be sure you address each of the elements of this assessment. Use the APA Paper Template, available in the Resources, to properly format your assessment.Journal Activity SummaryList each journal activity (for example, 4.1 Appreciative Inquiry) you completed for this assessment.Include a very brief description of the activity with in-text citations and references as needed to identify the location or source of the activity or additional resources.Summarize your personal reflections and insights to demonstrate what you learned from each of these experiential learning activities.Describe how these experiential activities or the character strengths they represent are related to optimal human functioning.Application to Personal, Professional, or Social IssuesSummarize how what you learned from the activities and the study of character strengths for this assessment may be applied to personal issues in your life, professional issues as in an educational or work setting, or social issues such as aging, mental health versus mental illness, and happiness and well-being.Analyze the strengths and weaknesses (advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons) of applying what you learned or the character strengths studied to the personal, professional, or social issues.Include supportive research findings related to these topics (1?2 scholarly resources).Be sure to use APA formatted in-text citations and references for the activity tools you select and cite all scholarly sources where appropriate. Your writing should be scholarly and professional, using proper APA formatting and style.Additional RequirementsWritten communication:ÿWritten communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.APA formatting:ÿYour paper should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.Length:ÿYour paper should be 3?4 typed and double-spaced pages, not including cover sheet and reference page.References:ÿYour paper should include 1?2 properly cited scholarly resources.Font and font size:ÿTimes New Roman, 12 point.Humanity and Justice Scoring GuideCRITERIANON-PERFORMANCEBASICPROFICIENTDISTINGUISHEDExplain reflections and insights related to experiential learning activities.ÿDoes not explain reflections or insights related to experiential learning activities.ÿLists but does not explain reflections or insights related to experiential learning activities.ÿExplains reflections and insights related to experiential learning activities.ÿAnalyzes reflections and insights related to experiential learning activities; identifies areas for further development.ÿSummarize how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues.Does not summarize how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues.ÿSummarizes how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues, but applications are unclear or inappropriate.ÿSummarizes how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues.ÿSummarizes how the study of character strengths may be applied to personal, professional, or social issues; identifies areas of uncertainty related to these applications.ÿDescribe the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning.ÿDoes not describe the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning.Describes the relationship between some experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning; or relationship described is inaccurate.ÿDescribes the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning.ÿDescribes the relationship between experiential activities or character strengths and optimal human functioning; provides examples as illustrations.Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues.ÿDoes not identify the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues.ÿIdentifies but does not analyze the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues.ÿAnalyzes the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues.ÿAnalyzes the strengths and weaknesses of applying character strengths to the personal, professional, or social issues; predicts outcomes or makes recommendations.ÿSupport analysis with research findings related to topics.ÿDoes not identify research findings related to topics.ÿIdentifies research findings related to topics but does not use them to support the analysis.ÿSupports analysis with research findings related to topics.ÿSupports analysis with research findings related to topics; incorporates relevant real-world examples or scenarios.Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.Writing does not support a central idea and does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics as expected of a psychology professional.ÿWriting supports an idea but is inconsistent and contains numerous errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics.ÿWriting coherently supports a central idea with few errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics.ÿWriting is coherent, using evidence to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professionalÿSuccessfully implement APA style.Does not apply proper APA formatting and style.ÿWritten communication is adequate but has some APA errors and inconsistencies.ÿSuccessfully implements APA style with only minor errors in format.ÿApplies scholarly writing skills and uses proper APA formatting and style in the body of the paper and references list.

paper 5

Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay ? Part IISynthesizing and WritingDue Week 4 and worth 100 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.For Part I of the assignment (due Week 2), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.In Part II of the assignment (due Week 4), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.Part II ? WritingWrite at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position ÿÿ and explain why you selected these specific reasons.3. Explain your answers to the ?believing? questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website.4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.ÿÿÿ5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the ?Believing Game,? even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA Style format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student?s name, the professor?s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language.Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic.Click here to view the grading rubric..

Analyze how the ideas and actions of Jean Monnet led to the creation of the European Economic Union in 1958. Point out the events that led to the…

Analyze how the ideas and actions of Jean Monnet led to the creation of the European Economic Union in 1958. Point out the events that led to the creation of the EEC, and what events followed. Clearly distinguish those countries that supported European unity and those that did not. Use specific details to support your answer. Then evaluate the relative success of the European Union (EU), in terms of its ability to create a “United States of Europe.”

Instruction: Write an m-le (MATLAB) for the following problem. Publish your answer(s) and/or gure(s) to PDF and submit them with your m-les.

Instruction: Write an m-?le (MATLAB) for the following problem. Publish your answer(s) and/or ?gure(s) to PDF and submit them with your m-?les. Be sure to include your name and title in both m-?le and ?gure.1. Plot a tangent plane and normal line to the following quadric surface at any saddle point as a point of tangency using the methods discussed in class. (a) Find a parametric equation for a hyperboloid of one sheet x^2 + y^2 ?z^2 = 1 using the methods discussed in class. (b) Find a parametric equation for a tangent plane to the hyperboloid of one sheet by using tangent vectors at the given point with symbolic derivatives. (c) Find a parametric equation for normal line using the normal vector at the given point on the surface. (d) Plot tangent plane and normal line together with hyperboloid of one sheet at any saddle point on the surface as a point of tangency.

The Ideas Only

Case AssignmentIn a well-written, 4- to 5-page paper, apply the Utility Test to the Mattel case study.Keys to the AssignmentChoose an ethical issue raised by the Mattel case studyÿ (e.g., you might choose to analyze Mattel?s treatment of employees).Apply the Utility Test: http://ethicsops.com/UtilityTest.phpBe sure that you follow each step of the Utility Test (use a separate section heading for discussion of each step of the test):Introduce the test.Briefly discuss why utility ethics is a valid way of deciding right and wrong.Apply the testStep 1: Identify the alternative actions that are possible and the persons and groups (the stakeholders) who will be affected by these actions.Step 2: For each of the most promising alternatives, determine the benefits and costs to each person or group affected.Step 3: Select the action in the current situation that produces the greatest benefits over costs for all affected.Step 4: Discuss what would happen if the action were a policy for all similar situations.Draw a conclusion. If the same action is selected in Steps 3 & 4, then the action is an ethical one. If different actions are selected, decide whether the individual action will produce the greatest good and the least harm, for all affected, over the long term.Be sure to use at least two sources from the library to support your discussion and analysis (choose sources that are not included in the Background section of Module 3).